Wednesday, April 9, 2014

why date of birth matters but astrology does not



Man. I respect individual differences but I am annoyed by notions of interconnectedness between living organisms and distant, lifeless masses. Cool picture though. So what then? Well, astrology doesn’t matter because stars and constellations do not contain information about the human lives on planet earth. Okay, that is somewhat presumptive. Let me elaborate.
From our perspective here on earth, we can observe a multitude of celestial bodies; stars, most easily. A star is an incandescent, spherical mass of plasma with helium and hydrogen gases swirling at the core. Before this, large molecular mists and space dust coalesce into smaller portions and simultaneously release heat. As temperatures increase, some fragments may condense and alas, a star is born. Slowly, that core dissipates and in some instances, the weight of the outer layers causes the star to collapse in upon itself—though, this process is decidedly more complex than my lay understanding and explanation suggests. Needless to say, stars, the faraway freckles of night sky, form and fall regardless of the happenings in human lives here on earth.
Astrology is the practice of interpreting how stars and constellations are situated in the sky and using those positions to make inferences about forthcoming life events and individual differences. At least here in the Western world, such divinations are often disseminated in horoscopes or, predictions written in generalized language (nomoethetic), and partitioned amongst the population according to birth date. This is one of the inherent flaws in the predictive robustness of astrology that also contributes to its popularity: Broad and ambiguous narratives allow imbibers to select the traits they identify in themselves. Furthermore, prescribed believers are more likely to remember those anecdotes that came to fruition (confirmation bias).
Indeed, I could continue to objectively describe this intuitional approach to predictive analytics but—consider the blog title. In the interest of full disclosure, because I like transparency and honesty, I share the sentiment of the character of Dr. Cooper in the video below. However, I would like to state, it is my understanding that some individuals may, for myriad reasons, possess a certain fondness of astrology and I, by no means, intend to impede upon, abase, or detract from their experiences. Simply stated, as a quasi-scholar, a facet of my research interests pertains to establishing tangible explanations of purported immaterial phenomena.


So essentially, the astrological methodology of classifying persons is dependent on the position of stars and constellations at the point of birth in relation to the position of those at a given period of time. You see, from our perspective here on earth, the position of stars and constellations change as the earth spins in its orbit around the sun. Likewise, as the earth spins, seasons change and the vicissitudes of seasons include shifts in weather. Thus, instead of using the arrangement of the stars at the time of parturition to infer personality and circumstance, a more sound explanation for such an inference is the fluctuation of meteorological conditions during gestation. That is to say, weather conditions such as temperature, barometric pressure, and precipitation, can affect the mother and intern affect the fetus in a manner that would promote certain personality traits.
There is a lengthy list of teratogens, or substances that can interfere with typical development of the fetus. For example, the deleterious effect of maternal alcohol consumption on fetal growth has been established since at least 1973 but medical reports date to the late 19th century and likely further into antiquity. Inadequate prenatal nutrition can lead to birth defects. Air pollution can result in preterm births and lower birth weights. And it gets redundant. Exposure to any of the above teratogens can bring about marked intellectual deficits and cognitive dysfunction. Conceivably, such deviations could manifest, in sum, as a unique expression of personality.
From here we progress to well-established associative links between prenatal exposure to flu and schizophrenia. Similar relationships have been identified between gestational flu and depression as well as bi-polar. At pathological levels, these are diagnosable psychiatric disorders; at any level of severity, each constitutes unique embodiments of personality. Thus far we have established that prenatal exposure to various substances and ailments poses significant detriments in the developing fetus and later functioning of the maturated person.
Weather (i.e., sunlight, precipitation, & air pressure) has been shown to have a small yet, significant, acute effect on mood that varies according to the individual individual. Mere exposure to light can improve mood, an effect that may be more or less pronounced depending on genetics. Well-documented are the periodic shifts in mental states that accompany seasonal affective disorder. Higher birth-month temperatures—or, lower gestational temperature—can predict the traits of self-directedness and persistence (both self-explanatory).
Continuing, May-June birthdates positively correlate with reward dependence, a personality trait characterized by an innate need to socialize and seek the approval of others. Unsurprisingly, the corresponding astrological symbol, Gemini, is described, in part, as being a veritable socialite who will often conform to those around them. Conversely, Sagittarius focuses on their own motivations and can communicate in such a manner that they appear to fail to consider how their words affect others. Likewise, Novemeber-December birthdates have been negatively associated with reward dependence; identified as being personally independent, practical, and, at times, socially insensitive.
For April-May births, these individuals have tested to be high in the trait of novelty seeking, that is, they are engaged by novel stimuli and assume extravagant approaches to potential reward. Conjunctly, the Taurus is described as having an innate proclivity for pleasures, material goods, and luxury. Thus, October-November birthdates and Scorpio’s which are low in novelty-seeking, are both described as reflective and resilient.
Now, these personality traits are grounded in empirical data. Psychological, genetic, and neurochemical correlates of these traits have been identified or at least appear evident when considering the data. However, I would not be surprised if you gleaned different interpretations from the astrological descriptions. After all, I was attempting to describe how astrology, an age-old practice, corresponds with—and is, in effect, accounted for by—recent empirical findings. That is, I, as infallible as I can be, may have inadvertently employed heuristics and succumbed to the confirmation bias and saw what I wanted to see.
So yes. Those are my essential grievances with astrology. I feel like I’m due some random bickering but, I’ll spare the reader. Forthcoming is the blog ‘everyone’ has been waiting on entitled Sex During Menstruation. Wrote it several years ago and am just now getting around to refining it and preparing it for public consumption. Others in preparation as well. Talk soon. All the best.
The young Tibetan sand fox will marvel in youthful conquest; stoic wisdom only comes with age.


Thursday, March 20, 2014

The Comeback




So it’s Spring Break. I suppose I could be on some overcrowded beach along the coastline, screaming “TITTIES!!” and getting shithoused; goading some inebriated coed(s) into compromising their morals and lowering their standards. However, I’ve elected to forgo such activities—and tanning my upper thighs—in favor of Morehead.  

Anyhow, without further ado, I would like to welcome myself back into the blogosphere. I’m approaching a five-year hiatus. I didn’t miss it. Fuck the blogosphere and specifically those fucking bloggers who, while engaged in face-to-face interactions, make throaty quips about their blogging some arcane topic or introducing some novel viewpoint that ‘most people’ are unaware of or unable to understand. GO MILK A COW WITH YOUR MOUTH. Furthermore, I’m sure no one experienced a pronounced longing for my wares, the product of a distorted perspective that is, of course, fueled by my first-world notions of entitlement. However, the reader interested in familiarizing themselves with my vainglorious and misogynistic writing is directed to the earlier incarnation of the blog.

So, how about Facebook and flirting?

Several months ago, actually nearly a year now, a friend of mine (who, mitigating circumstances aside, could totally get it) informed me that Facebook is a lucrative vehicle for mate selection. That is, several of her female friends had been courted using the popular social networking service. Now my friend, she is the same age and was in high school during the same epoch as I. However, to me, the act of pursuing a mate via Facebook is, at least ostensibly, borderline stalker behavior; though I cannot deny engaging in quasi-flirtatious behavior on Facebook—as both initiator and receptor. 

Familiar with my innate obliviousness for many of the processes that govern social convention and sensing my curiosity, she helped me probe deeper.twss T he process operates on the premise that, the suitor ought to have had even the most limited of face-to-face contact with the target mate (e.g., “saw you at a bar once”). Pursuant on this, a suitor could simply send the target a private message (PM) on FB. I’m dumbfounded; this is considered an acceptable catalyst for continued correspondence. I was advised that employing this method, the PM, as an initial approach is superior to contacting the target via the ‘live’ chat feature. This is because, unbeknownst to me, many females are often bombarded with requests to chat upon logging-in and many will disable that feature. She described other parameters of these courtship displays which exceed the scope of the current text. 

Why is this relevant today?

Since moving to Eastern KY, I have noticed that there is, amongst female eligibles, a sheer paucity of posterior. Anyhow, I ventured into the marketplace today, here in tiny Morehead, KY and happened upon an esthetically pleasing young woman with inklings of donk. It could have been her pants; I could be losing my skills. Regardless, I do not recall having seen her in this location or anywhere else about town. She was smiling and was generally amicable during the course of our interaction. I caught her name, and the absence of any child-soldier-sacrifice-studded finger-pendant signifying everlasting commitment. However, other patrons swayed, waiting as I completed my transaction and I exited without securing any further details about her. 

Now, I could have, yes, inquired about her relationship status and/or acquired contact info while waiting on line. However, in my view, that would be an unfair proposition because she is at her place of business; that is, she is focused on the duties of her post. Thus, I would stick her in the uncomfortable place of having to judge my character from and make a hasty decision based upon our brief interaction. While there is that annoying fucking adage “all’s fair in love and war”, in all fairness, I would prefer she had the opportunity to make a sound assessment of the pertinent factors before proceeding.

Okay. So back to Facebook. I believe that courting via FB is stalkery but, waiting outside someone’s place of employment is on some next-level, Richard-Ramirez-but-not-a-killer ass-crazy. Which I could have done, or I could have simply reentered the marketplace and made an attempt at simple discourse but, the aforesaid complications remain. Thus, I thought “why the fuck not look this broad up on Facebook,” and I did just that. 

The last time I used the Facebook people-search feature was a little less than a year ago. I searched for a female who is just ridiculously attractive and her intelligence is proportionate to her absurdly serious rear. I had not seen her in ages and, like a COMPLETE IDIOT, I declined to pursue a conversation upon seeing here while I was at work. Anywho, finding her was easy, perhaps because we have like 70-something mutual FB friends. 

However, today, when I tried to look up the girl from the market, I could only find like 12 females by her name attending or living near the University—a common white-girl name. So I tried some other variables to no avail. I even searched from some of the undergrads I deal with but am not FB friends with and also, was unable to find them. 

FUCK

Not about the female from the market though. She’s a fleeting desire that passed before writing half of this text. I’m hoping that my inability to find her or anyone else is the result of improved privacy restrictions FB has implemented. Otherwise, all of my well-honed research skills must be relearned. Ultimately though, I’ve reconciled that my little 17-minute experiment, based on some conversation I had a year ago, was pointless. I had no interest in and was frankly confused by the idea of FB courtship.

Yes. This was the woefully unremarkable reemergence of my blog, I Deux What I Want. Soon to follow will be a number of fun topics such as Personality is Not Unique to Humans: Dogs can be Bitches Too and Why Date of Birth Matters but Astrology Doesn’t. So be on the lookout for those and others. Oh, and this fox knows all